Research preview · 0.1.0-draft

No compatibility guarantee. Not for consequential production decisions.

Non-normative View current source

Proposals (RFCs)

This directory holds Requests for Comments (RFCs) — design records for material changes to the Judgment Pack Specification. An RFC is a proposal opened for public comment, in the sense used by projects such as Rust and React. An RFC is not part of the specification. Nothing here is normative, and no conformance class depends on any of it.

The purpose of this directory is to make the project's open design questions visible rather than to imply they are settled. Concepts that are frequently assumed to be part of Judgment Pack — a graph that composes packs, a planner that selects them, an evidence-integration layer, a discovery registry — are design questions, not shipped features. They live here as drafts until they are prototyped and shown to interoperate across independent implementations.

Process

See RFC 0000 — Request for Comments process for required sections, statuses, and the evidence bar. Material or normative changes require an RFC and a public review period; a stable feature requires two independent implementations and conformance cases.

Index

RFC Title Status Belongs to
0000 Request for Comments process Active Process
0001 Pack manifest Draft Specification (format)
0002 Judgment Graph composition Draft Specification (format)
0003 Evidence reference Draft Specification (format)
0004 Planner interface Draft Likely product
0005 Pack discovery Draft Specification (format) + product (service)

The "Belongs to" column records where each proposal would land if accepted. A format that independent tools must agree on is a candidate for the specification. An algorithm or engine belongs to a runtime. A hosted service belongs to a product. Several of these proposals split across that boundary, and saying so early is part of the design.